Hello Segher,
On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 13:09 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 04:59:40PM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> > My point is to reorgnize the approach in such a way, that sending reminders
> > gets irrelevant (has no impact) and
> > therefore not necessary.
> >
>
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 04:59:40PM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> As a matter of fact patches are not reviewed for whatever reason in
> reasonable time.
Yes. This is an age-old problem.
> My point is to reorgnize the approach in such a way, that sending reminders
> gets irrelevant (has no impa
Hello Segher,
your prompt answer is appreciated.
As a matter of fact patches are not reviewed for whatever reason in reasonable
time.
My point is to reorgnize the approach in such a way, that sending reminders
gets irrelevant (has no impact) and
therefore not necessary.
Currently priority is
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:16:27PM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Hello Segher,
>
> my question was how do you propose to proceed, so that a
> no-reminders-for-patches-are-necessary-state is reached.
>
> There is no relation with having infinite time or dealing with high-cost
> low-profit patch
Hello Segher,
my question was how do you propose to proceed, so that a
no-reminders-for-patches-are-necessary-state is reached.
There is no relation with having infinite time or dealing with high-cost
low-profit patches.
Previously I raised the quesion, whether automating the process for sendi
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:44:31PM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> -- at https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/contribute.html is written “If you do
> not receive a response to a patch that you
> have submitted within two weeks or so, it may be a good idea to chase it by
> sending a follow-up email to
Hello Segher,
the current procdure is:
-- write at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
-- read an answer, that the update shall be posted to gcc-patches
-- subscribe to gcc-patches, post the change and wait for an answer.
This waiting is not for free. There are a lot of emails, for the person might
Hi Dilyan,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 02:45:02PM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Do you share the opinion, that whatever can be done after receiving a
> reminder, can be arranged also without reminder?
Yes. When people have time for it, they can trivially check what PRs are
still open that they ar
Hello,
thanks to Serger and Joseph for the feedback.
Acting primary upon reminders is a general phenomenon in the society, nothing
specific to software teams. Think on
public administration: it acts sometimes much more collaboratively, if a
public/private/famous media reports on the
workflows
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:55:11AM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> will it help, if Bugzilla is reprogrammed to send automatically weekly
> reminders on all patches, that are not integrated yet?
No, that will not help.
If an interested party sends a friendly ping, that is of course welcome.
But au
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Will it help, if bugzilla is tweaked to send reminders every two weeks
> for ready-patches? This also has the advantage, that people will not
> have to once update a patch in BZ and then send it over gcc-patches.
For any proposed changes to patch sub
Hello,
the current way to come forward is to send biweekly manual reminders.
Will it help, if bugzilla is tweaked to send reminders every two weeks for
ready-patches? This also has the advantage,
that people will not have to once update a patch in BZ and then send it over
gcc-patches.
Regards
Hello,
what shall happen, so that no reminders are necessary to move things
forward? Why does sending a reminder make a difference and are only
penetrant persons blessed?
Regards
Дилян
On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 10:55 +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Hello,
>
> will it help, if Bugzilla is reprogr
Hello,
will it help, if Bugzilla is reprogrammed to send automatically weekly
reminders on all patches, that are not integrated yet?
Will lt help, if I hire myself to integrate the patch, or shall I
rather hire somebody to send reminders?
If something can be done after sending a reminder, then i
14 matches
Mail list logo
