On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Patches are usually ignored because everyone thinks someone else will
> handle it.
And in this case, it looks like this patch would best be reviewed first in
the GDB context - then once committed to binutils-gdb, the committer could
post to gcc-pa
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Can you please make it clear, when contributions will be ignored, or
> agree on some procedures, where all contributions are handled in
> reasonable time withot reminders, in a way that the processes work
> reliably.
1. You do not have a contract in pla
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 07:36:09AM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> on 27th October I sent to gcc-patches a mail with the subject “Don’t
> build gdb/readline/libreadline.a, when --with-system-readline is
> supplied”
The patch looks fine to me, fwiw.
> and on 14th November I sent a reminder. I
