Dear Cary,
I've been merging my patches to GCC mainline and I would really
appreciate new section naming convention that was suggested by you in
the previous post. Is there any progress in implementation? Should I
participate in this change and write a patch that will introduce this
new section
On 17 July 2013 20:22, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> > Yep, the problem is where to produce the section ordering file.
>>> > The scheme is as follows:
>>> > - with -fprofile-generate instrument every function entry point and
>>> > record
>>> > time of first and last invocation of the functoin
>>>
>> > Yep, the problem is where to produce the section ordering file.
>> > The scheme is as follows:
>> > - with -fprofile-generate instrument every function entry point and
>> > record
>> > time of first and last invocation of the functoin
>> > - At compile time we take functions that are
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>
> >> > The next thing is how to tell GNU LD/Gold the relative order of
> >> > functions.
> >> > I.e. my_function_section.order.125 or something like that?
> >>
> >> Gold has a --
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> > The next thing is how to tell GNU LD/Gold the relative order of functions.
>> > I.e. my_function_section.order.125 or something like that?
>>
>> Gold has a --section-ordering-file
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > The next thing is how to tell GNU LD/Gold the relative order of functions.
> > I.e. my_function_section.order.125 or something like that?
>
> Gold has a --section-ordering-file option that lets you specify the
> order in which sections
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> The next thing is how to tell GNU LD/Gold the relative order of functions.
> I.e. my_function_section.order.125 or something like that?
Gold has a --section-ordering-file option that lets you specify the
order in which sections should appear
> >> I am not sure how to update gold - I basically copied existing code in
> >> binutils
> >> for .text.unlikely group in GNU LD linker script, but I think gold is doing
> >> independent decisions somewhere.
>
> Ian committed this patch a few months ago, after a lengthy discussion
> around a pat
>> I am not sure how to update gold - I basically copied existing code in
>> binutils
>> for .text.unlikely group in GNU LD linker script, but I think gold is doing
>> independent decisions somewhere.
Ian committed this patch a few months ago, after a lengthy discussion
around a patch originally
On Nov 20, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> this is updated patch. I addressed, I hope, all the comments except for
> removing USE_SELECT_SECTION_FOR_FUNCTIONS. I am somewhat confused by darwin
> and
> thus would like to handle it incrementally.
>
> I've removed the subsection hash, the st
10 matches
Mail list logo
