On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> there are now a lot of empty directories. please remove.
Done on both mainline and 4.8 branch. Sorry about that.
Ian
Am 16.07.2013 08:55, schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
> patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
> including the changes to the files tha
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Rainer Orth
>> wrote:
>>> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>>>
I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Rainer Orth
>> wrote:
>>> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>>>
I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Rainer Orth
>> wrote:
>>> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>>>
I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
The test was re-run with GOTESTFLAGS=--keep. When running the
resulting a.out with "strace -f -o strace-x86_64 ./a.out" from the
saved test directory, the test behaved in the
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>>
>>> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
>>> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
>>> patch in this e-mail message,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> The test was re-run with GOTESTFLAGS=--keep. When running the
>>> resulting a.out with "strace -f -o strace-x86_64 ./a.out" from the
>>> saved test directory, the test behaved in the same way as on alpha -
>>> it hever finished. I have attac
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>>> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
>>> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
>>> patch in this e-m
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
>> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
>> patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
>> including
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
>> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
>> patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
>> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
>> patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Another problem was triggered on CentOS 5.9, where compile fails with:
>>
>> ../../../gcc-svn/trunk/libgo/runtime/netpoll_epoll.c: In function
>> ‘runtime_epollcreate1’:
>> ../../../gcc-svn/trunk/libgo/runtime/netpoll_epoll.c:41:2: error:
>
Hello!
I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
including the changes to the files that are partially gccgo-speci
Hello!
> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
> patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
> including the changes to the files that are partially gccgo-s
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
> patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
> including the changes to the files that are partially gccg
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>>> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
>>> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
>>> patch in this e-mail message,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
>> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
>> patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
>> including the changes to t
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 08:55 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
>> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
>> patch in this e-mail message, because i
Hello!
> I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
> part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
> patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
> including the changes to the files that are partially gccgo-specific.
> Boots
On 07/16/2013 08:55 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I have committed a large patch to update libgo to the library that was
part of the Go 1.1.1 release. As usual, I'm not including the entire
patch in this e-mail message, because it is too large. I'm only
including the changes to the files that are
22 matches
Mail list logo
