On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 13:56 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 07:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
> > quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
> > pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:48:43PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
> quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
> pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++ for
> printing better representatio
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 03:45:57PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> In this specific instance I was referring to getting meaningful data
> out of gdb when I do something like "p bb" or "p e" for a block and
> edge respectively.
>
> Printing the pointer is useful, but printing information about the
> actua
On 08/19/2013 03:28 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
I assume you mean basic blocks and edges? For that, you can already
use the CFG pretty printers with a file attached to a pipe and sent
through XDot (http://code.google.com/p/jrfonseca/wiki/XDot) which is
written in Python and quite easy to integrat
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 07:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
>> quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
>> pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++
On 08/02/2013 07:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++ for
printing better representations of STL containers.
So as I
> "David" == David Malcolm writes:
David> GDB 7.0 onwards supports hooks written in Python to improve the
David> quality-of-life within the debugger. The best known are the
David> pretty-printing hooks [1], which we already use within libstdc++ for
David> printing better representations of S
