On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:27:40PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'm just finishing testing this on various targets and will push to
> trunk. I'd like to backport it to gcc-11 too, to fix PR100179.
Ok for 11.1.
> commit 50070d8602a07160cece5890899929e9f210244d
> Author: Jonathan Wakely
> Date:
On 21/04/21 15:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/04/21 13:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/04/21 12:38 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/04/21 22:12 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
@@ -86,6 +88,24 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
}
}
+_GLIBCXX_ALWAYS_INLINE bool
+
On 21/04/21 13:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/04/21 12:38 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/04/21 22:12 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
@@ -86,6 +88,24 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
}
}
+_GLIBCXX_ALWAYS_INLINE bool
+_M_try_acquire() noexcept
+{
+ for (;;
Hi, Jonathan
Thanks for the further investigation. I definitely encountered the
missing _M_try_acquire in __platform_semaphore.
Thanks, David
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 8:12 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 21/04/21 12:38 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >On 20/04/21 22:12 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wr
On 2021-04-21 05:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/04/21 12:38 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 20/04/21 22:12
-0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote: @@ -86,6 +88,24 @@
_GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
}
}
+_GLIBCXX_ALWAYS_INLINE bool
+_M_try_acquire() noexcept
+{
+ for (;;)
+{
+
On 21/04/21 12:38 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/04/21 22:12 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
@@ -86,6 +88,24 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
}
}
+_GLIBCXX_ALWAYS_INLINE bool
+_M_try_acquire() noexcept
+{
+ for (;;)
+ {
+ auto __err = sem_trywait(&
On 20/04/21 22:12 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
@@ -86,6 +88,24 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
}
}
+_GLIBCXX_ALWAYS_INLINE bool
+_M_try_acquire() noexcept
+{
+ for (;;)
+ {
+ auto __err = sem_trywait(&_M_semaphore);
+ if (__err && (errno ==
On 21/04/21 10:56 +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:12:33PM -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
I think the attached patch (also in BZ) addresses the issue in
bits/semaphore_base.h, but I'm going to defer to Jonathan on why the macro
name is being transformed incorrec
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:12:33PM -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
> I think the attached patch (also in BZ) addresses the issue in
> bits/semaphore_base.h, but I'm going to defer to Jonathan on why the macro
> name is being transformed incorrectly in the first place.
Jonathan's call, but for me it l
