On 2015.01.16 at 12:03 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
> > On 2015.01.16 at 00:15 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> can_remove_node_now_p assumes that the node in question has no direct
> >> calls, this
> >> however is not checked
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2015.01.16 at 00:15 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi,
>> can_remove_node_now_p assumes that the node in question has no direct calls,
>> this
>> however is not checked in inline_call that leads to alias to be removed from
>> comdat g
On 2015.01.16 at 00:15 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> can_remove_node_now_p assumes that the node in question has no direct calls,
> this
> however is not checked in inline_call that leads to alias to be removed from
> comdat group while it should not.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux,