A bit belated, I have now committed the patch as Rev. 211587.
Thanks for confirming that it now works!
Tobias
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 06/04/2014 10:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Even with this applied, I'm still seeing similar failures.
I didn't claim that the patch woul
On 06/04/2014 10:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Even with this applied, I'm still seeing similar failures.
I didn't claim that the patch would fix everything – nor that it was
well tested.
Just wanted to report back since the problem doesn't really show up on
normal target
Hi Bernd,
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 06/04/2014 09:40 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
I intent to tests the build and test the patch - and then to
commit it as obvious. If you see problems with this approach
please scream now.
Even with this applied, I'm still seeing similar failures.
I didn't claim
On 06/04/2014 09:40 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Still untested patch, but I cannot resist pointing out stupid
typos by myself.
I intent to tests the build and test the patch - and then to
commit it as obvious. If you see problems with this approach
please scream now.
Even with this applied, I'm s
On 06/04/2014 09:40 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Still untested patch, but I cannot resist pointing out stupid
typos by myself.
I intent to tests the build and test the patch - and then to
commit it as obvious. If you see problems with this approach
please scream now.
I have no idea about the appr
Still untested patch, but I cannot resist pointing out stupid
typos by myself.
I intent to tests the build and test the patch - and then to
commit it as obvious. If you see problems with this approach
please scream now.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:13:44AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> + To be u
Tobias Burnus wrote:
There are two functions groups called with mask, cf. iresolve.c's
gfc_resolve_minloc. Namely, without dim "mmin0__" and with
dim "mmin1__". – The latter takes "dim" as additional
argument.
Thus, for mmin1_* the generated decl is fine, for mmin0_ is is not. I
do not immed
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
There's at least one more such problem with gfortran, which I'm having
a harder time debugging. It occurs in
gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/mloc.f90
That's minloc/maxloc, which takes three arguments on the Fortran side:
An array, optionally a dimension ("dim") and optio
On 05/27/2014 04:01 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Compiling Fortran code with the ptx backend I'm working on results in
assembler warnings about mismatch between function calls and function decls.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. Ok?
OK.
The change/bug is due to my fo
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Compiling Fortran code with the ptx backend I'm working on results in
> assembler warnings about mismatch between function calls and function decls.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. Ok?
OK.
The change/bug is due to my fortran-caf -> trunk patch at
https://gcc.gn
10 matches
Mail list logo
