Re: Fix PR66251 (wrong code with strided group stores)

2015-05-26 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Fri, 22 May 2015, Richard Biener wrote: > >It's currently regstrapping on x86_64-linux, okay for trunk if that > >passes? > > OK. r223704 now. I've tried to also add the fortran runtime testcase from the PR that now exists, but failed. The gfortran.dg/vect testsuite is strange and c

Re: Fix PR66251 (wrong code with strided group stores)

2015-05-22 Thread Richard Biener
On May 22, 2015 5:13:16 PM GMT+02:00, Michael Matz wrote: >Hi, > >between Richis improvements of grouped accesses, and mine to strided >stores is an interaction that now leads to ICEs and wrong code after >both >are in, for instance PR66251. The added testcases reflects this >situation, and us