Hi!
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:00:46 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 07/25/2014 09:01 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > [...] you may directly fold in the following patch to nuke the
> > unused OMP_LIST_COPY (or do that later).
> > --- gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c
> > +++ gcc/fortran/dump-parse-
Hi!
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:11:08 +0200, I wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:42:32 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
> > On 07/11/2014 03:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > >> To avoid duplication of work: with Jakub's Fortran Open
On 08/01/2014 12:48 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 05:42:32PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
Jakub, before your Fortran OpenMP 4 target changes, Ilmir had written the
test case gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/map-1.f90 (based on his
interpretation and implementati
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 05:42:32PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> >> Jakub, before your Fortran OpenMP 4 target changes, Ilmir had written the
> >> test case gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/map-1.f90 (based on his
> >> interpretation and implementation of OpenMP 4 target), which I have now
> >> a
On 07/25/2014 09:01 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:44:13 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
>> On 07/24/2014 06:11 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>>> I'd suggest to continue to handle all the data clauses [...]
>>
>> I moved all of the data clause matching back to gfc_match_omp_c
Hi Cesar!
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:44:13 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 06:11 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > I'd suggest to continue to handle all the data clauses [...]
>
> I moved all of the data clause matching back to gfc_match_omp_clauses,
> and I guarded the copyin clause w
On 07/24/2014 06:11 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> OMP_LIST_DEVICEPTR remains to be converted, which can be done as a later
> follow-up patch.
Yes, that's the plan.
> I'd suggest to continue to handle all the data clauses...
>
>>
>> /* Match OpenMP and OpenACC directive clauses. MASK is a bitm
Hi Cesar!
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:42:32 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 07/11/2014 03:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >> To avoid duplication of work: with Jakub's Fortran OpenMP 4 target
> >> changes recently committed to tr
On 07/11/2014 03:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> To avoid duplication of work: with Jakub's Fortran OpenMP 4 target
>> changes recently committed to trunk, and now merged into gomp-4_0-branch,
>> I have trimmed down Ilmir's patch to
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> To avoid duplication of work: with Jakub's Fortran OpenMP 4 target
> changes recently committed to trunk, and now merged into gomp-4_0-branch,
> I have trimmed down Ilmir's patch to just the OpenACC bits, OpenMP 4
> target changes r
Hi!
On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:31:25 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov wrote:
> On 16.05.2014 19:44, Ilmir Usmanov wrote:
> > On 16.05.2014 19:12, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >> You recently indicated that you have already begun implementing OpenACC
> >> subarray specifications in the GCC Fortran front end, but have
11 matches
Mail list logo
