Richard Biener-2 wrote
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:50 AM, dxq <
> ziyan01@
> > wrote:
>
> What compiler version did you check? I think that 4.8 has improvements
> for 1. and 2. (SMS is unmaintained). Note that we only spent time to
> make -O1 behave sanely with extremely large functions.
>
>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:50 AM, dxq wrote:
> Richard Biener-2 wrote
>> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:29 AM, dxq <
>
>> ziyan01@
>
>> > wrote:
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> We found that gcc would run out of memory on Windows when compiling a
>>> *big*
>>> function (10 lines).
>>>
>>> More investigation show
Richard Biener-2 wrote
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:29 AM, dxq <
> ziyan01@
> > wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> We found that gcc would run out of memory on Windows when compiling a
>> *big*
>> function (10 lines).
>>
>> More investigation shows that gcc crashes at the function
>> *compute_avail*,
>> i
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:29 AM, dxq wrote:
> hi all,
>
> We found that gcc would run out of memory on Windows when compiling a *big*
> function (10 lines).
>
> More investigation shows that gcc crashes at the function *compute_avail*,
> in tree-fre pass. *compute_avail* collects information f
