On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Please review the new patch.
The new patch is OK with a suitable ChangeLog entry.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Please review the new patch.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Joseph S. Myers
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2011-04-18 Neil Vac
That will work. Revised patch coming up.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Joseph S. Myers
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2011-04-
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Joseph S. Myers
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> >
> >> 2011-04-18 Neil Vachharajani
> >>
> >> * flags.c: New flag variable.
> >> * opts.c (common_handle_options): Set flag_we
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>
>> 2011-04-18 Neil Vachharajani
>>
>> * flags.c: New flag variable.
>> * opts.c (common_handle_options): Set flag_werror_set.
>> * opts-global.c (decode_options): Delay Werror
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> 2011-04-18 Neil Vachharajani
>
> * flags.c: New flag variable.
> * opts.c (common_handle_options): Set flag_werror_set.
> * opts-global.c (decode_options): Delay Werror decision
> for Wcoverage-mismatch util after options are par
Ping ..
David
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> This would work if there is a way to set Werror=coverage-mismatch
> without having to explicitly set the option classification as
> DK_ERROR. Does this mechanism exist?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1
This would work if there is a way to set Werror=coverage-mismatch
without having to explicitly set the option classification as
DK_ERROR. Does this mechanism exist?
Thanks,
David
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Xinliang David Li wr
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> -Wcoverage-mismatch is enabled by default, and the warning is promoted
> to error by default. However in the current implementation -Wno-error
> can not demote the error back to warning. The patch was ported from
> one contributed by Neil
