On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Please review this patch. Regression test is ok. I will do more
> application testing to make sure the check is not too strict
> (filtering out legal ic targets).
This one is ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> 2011-04-07 Xin
Is this patch OK?
Thanks,
David
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> SPEC06 build with FDO is ok with the patch -- no abnormality was found.
>
> David
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Please review this patch. Regression test is ok. I will d
SPEC06 build with FDO is ok with the patch -- no abnormality was found.
David
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Please review this patch. Regression test is ok. I will do more
> application testing to make sure the check is not too strict
> (filtering out legal ic target
Please review this patch. Regression test is ok. I will do more
application testing to make sure the check is not too strict
(filtering out legal ic targets).
Thanks,
David
2011-04-07 Xinliang David Li
* value-profile.c (function_decl_num_args): New function.
(check_ic_target
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Hi, due to race conditions, it is common that the value profile
> information for an indirect call site is 'corrupted' -- resulting in
> false target function to be recorded. The value profile transformation
> won't cause runtime problem a
