On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 17:24, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 09:56, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 11:35, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 21:00, Richard Sandiford
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Prathamesh Kulkarn
On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 09:56, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 11:35, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 21:00, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches writes:
> > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:00, Prathamesh Kulka
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 11:35, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 21:00, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches writes:
> > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 15:27, Richard Sandif
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 21:00, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches writes:
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 15:27, Richard Sandiford
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > > On Wed,
Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 15:27, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 21:07, Richard Sandiford
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Sor
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 14:37, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 15:27, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 21:07, Richard Sandiford
> > > > wrot
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 15:27, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 21:07, Richard Sandiford
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Sorry for the slow response. I wanted to find some time to t
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 15:27, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 21:07, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry for the slow response. I wanted to find some time to think
> >> about this a bit more.
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 21:07, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the slow response. I wanted to find some time to think
>> about this a bit more.
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 21:38, Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >
On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 21:07, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Sorry for the slow response. I wanted to find some time to think
> about this a bit more.
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 21:38, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches write
Sorry for the slow response. I wanted to find some time to think
about this a bit more.
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 21:38, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches writes:
>> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> >> Sorry to ask a silly question
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 16:02, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 16:18, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 21:38, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches writes:
> > > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > >> Sorry t
On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 16:18, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 21:38, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches writes:
> > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > >> Sorry to ask a silly question but in which case shall we select 2nd
> > >> vector ?
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 21:38, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches writes:
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> Sorry to ask a silly question but in which case shall we select 2nd vector
> >> ?
> >> For num_poly_int_coeffs == 2,
> >> a1 /trunc n1 == (a1 + 0x) / (n1.co
Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches writes:
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> Sorry to ask a silly question but in which case shall we select 2nd vector ?
>> For num_poly_int_coeffs == 2,
>> a1 /trunc n1 == (a1 + 0x) / (n1.coeffs[0] + n1.coeffs[1]*x)
>> If a1/trunc n1 succeeds,
>> 0 / n1.coeffs[1] =
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 01:59, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 21:33, Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> >> > On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 18:09, Richard Sandiford
>> >> >
On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 01:59, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 21:33, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 18:09, Richard Sandiford
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarn
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 21:33, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 18:09, Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> >> > On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 19:57, Richard Sandiford
>> >> >
On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 21:33, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 18:09, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 19:57, Richard Sandiford
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarn
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 18:09, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 19:57, Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> >> >> The VLA encoding encodes the first N patterns explicitly.
On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 18:09, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 19:57, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> >> The VLA encoding encodes the first N patterns explicitly. The
> >> >> npatterns/nelts_per_patter
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 19:57, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> >> The VLA encoding encodes the first N patterns explicitly. The
>> >> npatterns/nelts_per_pattern values then describe how to extend that
>> >> initial sequence to an ar
On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 19:57, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 15:51, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry for the slow reply. I wrote a response a couple of weeks ago
> >> but I think it get lost in a machine outage.
> >>
> >> Pratham
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 15:51, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the slow reply. I wrote a response a couple of weeks ago
>> but I think it get lost in a machine outage.
>>
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > Hi,
>> > The attached prototype patch extends fo
On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 15:51, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Sorry for the slow reply. I wrote a response a couple of weeks ago
> but I think it get lost in a machine outage.
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi,
> > The attached prototype patch extends fold_vec_perm to fold VEC_PERM_EXPR
> > in
Sorry for the slow reply. I wrote a response a couple of weeks ago
but I think it get lost in a machine outage.
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> Hi,
> The attached prototype patch extends fold_vec_perm to fold VEC_PERM_EXPR
> in VLA manner, and currently handles the following cases:
> (a) fixed len
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 11:38, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 18:09, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > The attached prototype patch extends fold_vec_perm to fold VEC_PERM_EXPR
> > in VLA manner, and currently handles the following cases:
> > (a) fixed len arg0, ar
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 18:09, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The attached prototype patch extends fold_vec_perm to fold VEC_PERM_EXPR
> in VLA manner, and currently handles the following cases:
> (a) fixed len arg0, arg1 and fixed len sel.
> (b) fixed len arg0, arg1 and vla sel
> (c) vla arg
28 matches
Mail list logo
