On 20/02/2018 20:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 8 February 2018 at 06:10, François Dumont wrote:
On 06/02/2018 20:16, François Dumont wrote:
On 05/02/2018 18:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to simply make __aligned_buffer identical
to __aligned_membuf for the versioned-na
On 8 February 2018 at 06:10, François Dumont wrote:
> On 06/02/2018 20:16, François Dumont wrote:
>>
>> On 05/02/2018 18:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it make more sense to simply make __aligned_buffer identical
>>> to __aligned_membuf for the versioned-namespace? Then at least the
>>
On 06/02/2018 20:16, François Dumont wrote:
On 05/02/2018 18:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to simply make __aligned_buffer identical
to __aligned_membuf for the versioned-namespace? Then at least the
conditional code is only in one place.
Yes, __aligned_buffer is indeed
On 05/02/2018 18:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/02/18 22:48 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
As we just bump version namespace it might be interesting to do
the following change now. What do you think ?
I'd rather not make the code harder to read in all those places just
for an optiona
On 01/02/18 22:48 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
As we just bump version namespace it might be interesting to do
the following change now. What do you think ?
I'd rather not make the code harder to read in all those places just
for an optional mode that nobody uses.
Wouldn't it make mo
