Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf'

2023-10-29 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
> From: Thomas Schwinge > Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:42:26 +0200 > It's just GCC and Binutils/GDB, or are the top-level files also shared > with additional projects? Not sure if that counts as "shared", but I regularly drop in* newlib to build simulator targets (*-elf, *-newabi). That's git://sou

Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf'

2023-10-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Oct 19, 2023, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On 2023-10-18T15:42:18+0100, R jd <3246251196r...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I guess I can ask, why there is not a recursive approach for configuring >> GCC. e.g. AC_SUBDIRS in the top level? > ('AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS' you mean.) You know, often it just takes som

Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf'

2023-10-19 Thread Eric Gallager
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:43 AM Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi! > > On 2023-10-19T11:57:33+0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Okt 19 2023, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >> On 2023-10-18T15:42:18+0100, R jd <3246251196r...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I guess I can ask, why there is not a recursive approach

Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf'

2023-10-19 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2023-10-19T11:57:33+0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Okt 19 2023, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> On 2023-10-18T15:42:18+0100, R jd <3246251196r...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I guess I can ask, why there is not a recursive approach for configuring >>> GCC. e.g. AC_SUBDIRS in the top level? >> >> ('AC

Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf'

2023-10-19 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 19 2023, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On 2023-10-18T15:42:18+0100, R jd <3246251196r...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I guess I can ask, why there is not a recursive approach for configuring >> GCC. e.g. AC_SUBDIRS in the top level? > > ('AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS' you mean.) You know, often it just ta