Re: Context sensitive type inheritance graph walking

2013-11-18 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, it took me a while to get back to this patch (especially because I wanted to understand the issues with virtual inheritance first). Here is updated version that should reflect your comments. I will do some extra testing tomorrow and plan to commit it. Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux. H

Re: Context sensitive type inheritance graph walking

2013-09-28 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi, > > sorry it took me so long, but it also took me quite a while to chew > through. Please consider posting context diff in cases like this. > Nevertheless, most of the patch is a nice improvement. Uhm, sorry. Seems I diffed from a different users. > > There is cgraph_indirect_call_info tha

Re: Context sensitive type inheritance graph walking

2013-09-27 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, sorry it took me so long, but it also took me quite a while to chew through. Please consider posting context diff in cases like this. Nevertheless, most of the patch is a nice improvement. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > this is updated version of > http

Re: Context sensitive type inheritance graph walking

2013-09-25 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On 2013.09.25 at 12:20 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > this is updated version of > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00936.html > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux. The patch is tested by ipa-devirt9 > > testcase. I have extra four, but I would like to first fix the case w

Re: Context sensitive type inheritance graph walking

2013-09-25 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2013.09.25 at 12:20 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > this is updated version of > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00936.html > > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux. The patch is tested by ipa-devirt9 > testcase. I have extra four, but I would like to first fix the case where the > d