On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi,
>> sorry for getting back to this late.
>>> >> That's a larger error than I had expected from the merging, although
>>> >> as you note it is an approximation so there is going to b
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> sorry for getting back to this late.
>> >> That's a larger error than I had expected from the merging, although
>> >> as you note it is an approximation so there is going to be some amount
>> >> of error. If the error is that large then
Hi,
sorry for getting back to this late.
> >> That's a larger error than I had expected from the merging, although
> >> as you note it is an approximation so there is going to be some amount
> >> of error. If the error is that large then maybe there is a better
> >> merging algorithm, since in the
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Rong Xu wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Teresa Johnson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > currently we use Theresa's code to determine hot/cold decisions based on
>> > counter.
>> > Histogram of gcov c
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> currently we use Theresa's code to determine hot/cold decisions based on
> counter.
> Histogram of gcov counters is computed and then threshold is identified so
> 99.9% of counter increments gets done in hot region. There are some prob
