Hi!
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:58:07 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:12:03AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > OK to apply the following cleanup patches to trunk, assuming that testing
> > (still running) is fine?
Thanks for the review!
> > Reflect reality in comment.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:12:03AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> OK to apply the following cleanup patches to trunk, assuming that testing
> (still running) is fine?
> gcc/c/
> * c-parser.c (c_parser_omp_parallel): Fix description.
> gcc/cp/
> parser.c (cp_parser_omp_para
Hi!
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:04:29 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The testing _OPENMP value against 201107 won't work after merge, it will be
> 201307 instead. The Fortran openmp_version will be still 201107 for now,
> as Fortran OpenMP 4.0 support isn't there yet.
And:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:13:38
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Meanwhile, here's another series that I assumed had gotten lost, but now
> recovered thanks to Âgit fsckÂ. Also OK to commit?
>
> _OPENMP pre-processor checks, openmp_version Fortran instrinsic checks.
Two remarks:
* When Jakub's patch gets it, one needs to update the C/
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:56:25AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 22:04:23 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:17:35AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > Here are a few cleanup patches, mostly in the realm of OpenMP, so Jakub
> > > gets a CC. OK to comm
Hi!
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 22:04:23 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:17:35AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Here are a few cleanup patches, mostly in the realm of OpenMP, so Jakub
> > gets a CC. OK to commit?
>
> They look ok to me, but I'd prefer if they could go in afte
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:17:35AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Here are a few cleanup patches, mostly in the realm of OpenMP, so Jakub
> gets a CC. OK to commit?
They look ok to me, but I'd prefer if they could go in after the merge
I've just posted.
Jakub
