Re: Clean up LTO generation

2013-11-18 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 11/18/2013 02:03 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Bernd Schmidt >>> wrote: The following patch simplifies this by getting rid of all_lto_gen_passes. We could simplify a little further if we decided w

Re: Clean up LTO generation

2013-11-18 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 11/18/2013 02:03 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Bernd Schmidt >> wrote: >>> The following patch simplifies this by getting rid of >>> all_lto_gen_passes. We could simplify a little further if we decided we >>> really don't need two different timevars for different

Re: Clean up LTO generation

2013-11-18 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Bernd Schmidt > wrote: > > I'm looking into using LTO to pass information between compilers for > > different targets, for the OpenACC implementation. This area of the > > compiler seems somewhat obfuscated by overengineering, and I'd like to > > simplify it fi

Re: Clean up LTO generation

2013-11-18 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > I'm looking into using LTO to pass information between compilers for > different targets, for the OpenACC implementation. This area of the > compiler seems somewhat obfuscated by overengineering, and I'd like to > simplify it first to make i