Re: CPU_NONE ix86_schedule cpu attribute for -march=nocona

2012-04-17 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I found the following problem while investigating SMS on x86-64. >> > When I run gcc with -march=nocona (on pentium-

Re: CPU_NONE ix86_schedule cpu attribute for -march=nocona

2012-04-17 Thread Alexander Monakov
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I found the following problem while investigating SMS on x86-64. > > When I run gcc with -march=nocona (on pentium-4 with EM64T extension), all > > latencies in data dependency graph b

Re: CPU_NONE ix86_schedule cpu attribute for -march=nocona

2012-04-17 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote: > Hello, > > I found the following problem while investigating SMS on x86-64. > When I run gcc with -march=nocona (on pentium-4 with EM64T extension), all > latencies in data dependency graph become zeros. The global pointer > "insn_default_lat