Re: C1X Unicode strings without raw strings

2011-08-18 Thread Jason Merrill
On 08/18/2011 11:15 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: predefined by the compiler. (I'm presuming that difference from C1X is still there in the approved version of C++0X, although it's doubtful that C++ *should* differ from C1X in this way.) Thanks, I've raised the issue. Jason

Re: C1X Unicode strings without raw strings

2011-08-18 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > @@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ struct cpp_options > >/* Nonzero means process u/U prefix literals (UTF-16/32). */ > >unsigned char uliterals; > > > > + /* Nonzero means process r/R rax strings.

Re: C1X Unicode strings without raw strings

2011-08-18 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > @@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ struct cpp_options >/* Nonzero means process u/U prefix literals (UTF-16/32). */ >unsigned char uliterals; > > + /* Nonzero means process r/R rax strings. If this is set, uliterals > + must be set as well. */