On 23 October 2014 12:39, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> To take this further, I am thinking that these guidelines would be even
> better served by standing on their own page. If nobody objects, I can
> create a DiagnosticsGuidelines page in the wiki with the content that you
> added.
Since you are a
Manuel López-Ibáñez writes:
> On 17 October 2014 20:04, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> On 17 October 2014 19:33, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>>>
Thus, I drafted some guidelines
at:https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Diagnostics#guidelines
Manuel López-Ibáñez writes:
> On 17 October 2014 19:33, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>>
>>> Thus, I drafted some guidelines
>>> at:https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Diagnostics#guidelines
>>>
>>> Please, could you take a look and comment whether I got i
On 17 October 2014 20:04, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 17 October 2014 19:33, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>>
>>> Thus, I drafted some guidelines
>>> at:https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Diagnostics#guidelines
>>>
>>> Please, could you take a look and
On 17 October 2014 19:33, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>
>> Thus, I drafted some guidelines
>> at:https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Diagnostics#guidelines
>>
>> Please, could you take a look and comment whether I got it right/wrong?
>
> Yes, that looks rig
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Thus, I drafted some guidelines
> at:https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Diagnostics#guidelines
>
> Please, could you take a look and comment whether I got it right/wrong?
Yes, that looks right to me.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
