Hi!
On Wed, 24 May 2017 13:20:54 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:55:27PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 May 2017 13:07:15 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > new symbols should never be added to an existing symbol
> > > version after a GCC version with that s
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:55:27PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Jakub!
>
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 13:07:15 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > In , we currently describe acc_pcopyin, acc_pcreate as "old
> > > names", but they'r
Hi Jakub!
On Tue, 23 May 2017 13:07:15 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > In , we currently describe acc_pcopyin, acc_pcreate as "old
> > names", but they're not "old" but really "alternative names", with the
> > intention to provide
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> In , we currently describe acc_pcopyin, acc_pcreate as "old
> names", but they're not "old" but really "alternative names", with the
> intention to provide them at symbol level, not via "#define"s. OK for
> trunk?
No.
>
