On 01/21/2012 06:02 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Does this mean that the { target c++98 } lines are acceptable in C++11,
while the { xfail c++11 } lines are still errors in C++11, but aren't
detected?
Right.
The reason for asking is that the line:
g<(void (A::*)())&B::f>(); // { dg-erro
A mere two months after you posted the patch:
Jason Merrill writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C
> index 8802e98..19f1591 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g+
On 11/09/2011 04:01 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Nice, but ... is there a way to launch the testsuite with only one
mode at a time ?
Not currently.
Jason
Hi,
2011/11/9 Jason Merrill :
> On 11/09/2011 01:02 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>
>> To confirm: what do the PASS or FAIL lines look like?
>
> For tests run in both modes, they look like
>
> PASS: g++.dg/whatever -std=c++98
> PASS: g++.dg/whatever -std=c++11
Nice, but ... is there a way to launch
On 11/09/2011 01:02 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
To confirm: what do the PASS or FAIL lines look like?
For tests run in both modes, they look like
PASS: g++.dg/whatever -std=c++98
PASS: g++.dg/whatever -std=c++11
Jason
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Jason Merrill wrote:
> While working on an earlier PR I noticed that make check-c++0x wasn't actually
> running a lot of tests in C++11 mode because the -std=c++11 that it added came
> before the default arguments, so any test without a { dg-options } line would
> still be run
