On 8/23/19 5:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 8/23/19 11:55 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK on Monday if Nathan doesn't have more comments before then.
ok by me, thanks
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
On 8/23/19 11:55 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:49:49AM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:01 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 8/20/19 9:03 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
and in cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt we simply don't know if we're
dealing with a fu
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:49:49AM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:01 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> >
> > On 8/20/19 9:03 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > > and in cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt we simply don't know if we're
> > > dealing with a function decl. Calling c
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:01 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> On 8/20/19 9:03 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > and in cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt we simply don't know if we're
> > dealing with a function decl. Calling cp_warn_deprecated_use_scopes from
> > cp_parser_type_specifier resulted int
On 8/20/19 9:03 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
and in cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt we simply don't know if we're
dealing with a function decl. Calling cp_warn_deprecated_use_scopes from
cp_parser_type_specifier resulted int duplicated diagnostics so that one
is out too. So I did the following
