On 02/16/2016 02:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:00:45PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/10/2016 10:31 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/09/2016 03:29 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
This patch broke Solaris bootstrap (seen on i386-pc-solaris2.12):
Fixed by pruning hidden names
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:00:45PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 02/10/2016 10:31 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >On 02/09/2016 03:29 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >>This patch broke Solaris bootstrap (seen on i386-pc-solaris2.12):
> >
> >Fixed by pruning hidden names from the lookup result in more place
On 02/10/2016 10:31 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/09/2016 03:29 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
This patch broke Solaris bootstrap (seen on i386-pc-solaris2.12):
Fixed by pruning hidden names from the lookup result in more places.
...and this broke some dubious code in LLVM. Fixed thus.
Tested x86
On 02/09/2016 03:29 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
This patch broke Solaris bootstrap (seen on i386-pc-solaris2.12):
Fixed by pruning hidden names from the lookup result in more places.
Jason
commit 09bb9e19d3f284c2f9d8bf57959c99334363c3c9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tue Feb 9 16:20:46 2016 -0500
Jason Merrill writes:
> The issue in this bug was that due to changes in the libstdc++ headers, the
> built-in abs declaration was getting hidden by a using-declaration, so that
> then when the built-in got an explicit declaration, the original
> declaration wasn't there anymore and so the new de
