Marc Glisse writes:
| On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > C++ has a much more predictable semantics for inline functions, so we no
| > longer need to define them (especially in header files) with the
| > 'static' specifier. The upshot is that when the compiler fails to
| > inline
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
C++ has a much more predictable semantics for inline functions, so we no
longer need to define them (especially in header files) with the
'static' specifier. The upshot is that when the compiler fails to
inline a call in a given translation unit, it
