On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> The first BIT_FIELD_REF folding pattern assumed without checking that
> operands satisfy tree_fits_uhwi_p. The second pattern does check this:
>
> /* On constants we can use native encode/interpret to constant
> fold (near
On 01/04/2018 03:06 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> The first BIT_FIELD_REF folding pattern assumed without checking that
> operands satisfy tree_fits_uhwi_p. The second pattern does check this:
>
> /* On constants we can use native encode/interpret to constant
> fold (nearly) all B