On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On September 29, 2020 4:20:42 PM GMT+02:00, Jan Hubicka
> > wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >this patch is not needed but makes it possible to sanity check that
> > >fnspec match function signature. It turns out that there are quite few
> > >mistakes in that in tr
> On September 29, 2020 4:20:42 PM GMT+02:00, Jan Hubicka
> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >this patch is not needed but makes it possible to sanity check that
> >fnspec match function signature. It turns out that there are quite few
> >mistakes in that in trans-decl and one mistake here.
> >Transfer_derived ha
On September 29, 2020 4:20:42 PM GMT+02:00, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>Hi,
>this patch is not needed but makes it possible to sanity check that
>fnspec match function signature. It turns out that there are quite few
>mistakes in that in trans-decl and one mistake here.
>Transfer_derived has additional pa
On 9/29/20 4:45 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
My fixup is longer:)
Heh. So please include my gcc_checking_assert hunk to your patch.
Martin
All strings starting with R or W are wrong. However I have instances of
miamatched lengths say for caf_register, deregister and others.
There are few cases wh
> On 9/29/20 4:20 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > this patch is not needed but makes it possible to sanity check that
> > fnspec match function signature. It turns out that there are quite few
>
> I'm sending the run-time sanity check patch and few more places that assert.
> I'm going to test the patch
On 9/29/20 4:20 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
this patch is not needed but makes it possible to sanity check that
fnspec match function signature. It turns out that there are quite few
I'm sending the run-time sanity check patch and few more places that assert.
I'm going to test the patch.
Martin
>Fr
