On 21/08/15 21:30 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Ok, it looks like you really want to provide this check in pre-C++11
mode so here it is.
Tested under Linux x86_64.
Ok to commit ?
This looks great, thanks for doing the extra work to avoid the SFINAE
checks when the types are the same. Very nic
On 01/08/2015 02:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 31 July 2015 at 20:49, François Dumont wrote:
>> On 30/07/2015 12:30, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 29/07/15 22:08 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Standard algos signatures are such that there is no guaranty that
the operator < or predicat
On 31 July 2015 at 20:49, François Dumont wrote:
> On 30/07/2015 12:30, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 29/07/15 22:08 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>>>Standard algos signatures are such that there is no guaranty that
>>> the operator < or predicate to compare the iterator value type will
>>> exis
On 30/07/2015 12:30, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 29/07/15 22:08 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>Here is a patch to add irreflexive debug check.
>
> Awesome!
>
> You can add PR libstdc++/60519 to the changelog.
Sure.
>
>
>>Standard algos signatures are such that there is no guaranty
On 29/07/15 22:08 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a patch to add irreflexive debug check.
Awesome!
You can add PR libstdc++/60519 to the changelog.
Standard algos signatures are such that there is no guaranty that
the operator < or predicate to compare the iterator value typ
