On 11/16/2012 04:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I expect it's pronounced with a sort of throat-clearing noise that is
hard to write. Sort of like the gargling sound represented by "argh."
argh32 and argh64.
I thought it was a nice way to enshrine a Monty Python joke into silicon.
--
Toon M
On 16/11/12 15:35, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 11/14/2012 01:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Please please don't get into the habit of calling it ARM32 and ARM64,
you're just sowing confusion; there are good reasons why those names
weren't ad
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 01:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> Please please don't get into the habit of calling it ARM32 and ARM64,
>> you're just sowing confusion; there are good reasons why those names
>> weren't adopted (some technical, some not) an
On 11/14/2012 01:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Please please don't get into the habit of calling it ARM32 and ARM64,
> you're just sowing confusion; there are good reasons why those names
> weren't adopted (some technical, some not) and I'm not about to rehash
> them all now. AArch32 and AA
From: Dodji Seketeli
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:26:40 +0100
> I guess we could do that. That would build libsanitizer, but asan will
> still not be available on sparc if the asan_shadow_offset() target hook
> is not provided. Is that OK to you?
Yes.
On 13/11/12 22:41, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
On 13 Nov 2012, at 21:18, Konstantin Serebryany
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
This has broken the
David Miller writes:
> From: Diego Novillo
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:21:59 -0500
>
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> This has broken the build on every Linux target that hasn't added
>>> the necessary cpu specific code to asan_linux.cc
>>
>> This should be fixe
Diego Novillo writes:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> This has broken the build on every Linux target that hasn't added
>> the necessary cpu specific code to asan_linux.cc
>
> This should be fixed by Dodji's recent patch. ASAN is not currently
> ported to any targe
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13 Nov 2012, at 21:18, Konstantin Serebryany
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David M
+euge...@google.com
>>>
>>> asan run-time (and the LLVM part) works on Mac and on ARM/Linux.
>>
>> And when you say ARM / Linux, has this been tested on older versions of the
>> architecture or just v7-a ?
Evgeniy is better equipped to answer this.
At some point we've been testing asan on the ac
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
>
>
> On 13 Nov 2012, at 21:18, Konstantin Serebryany
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
This has broken the build on every Linux ta
On 13 Nov 2012, at 21:18, Konstantin Serebryany
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> This has broken the build on every Linux target that hasn't added
>>> the necessary cpu specific code to asan_linux
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> This has broken the build on every Linux target that hasn't added
>> the necessary cpu specific code to asan_linux.cc
>
> This should be fixed by Dodji's recent patch. ASAN is not
From: Diego Novillo
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:21:59 -0500
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> This has broken the build on every Linux target that hasn't added
>> the necessary cpu specific code to asan_linux.cc
>
> This should be fixed by Dodji's recent patch. ASAN i
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> This has broken the build on every Linux target that hasn't added
>> the necessary cpu specific code to asan_linux.cc
>
> This should be fixed by Dodji's recent patch. ASAN is not
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
>
> This has broken the build on every Linux target that hasn't added
> the necessary cpu specific code to asan_linux.cc
This should be fixed by Dodji's recent patch. ASAN is not currently
ported to any target other than x86/linux, so it shou
16 matches
Mail list logo
