Hi!
This last hunk is wrong, for sprintf you need to use %% instead of %.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:23:36PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> @@ -10631,7 +10633,7 @@ (define_insn "*push_fp_multi"
>{
> char pattern[100];
>
> -sprintf (pattern, \"sfmfd\\t%%1, %d, [%%m0]!\", XVECLEN (ope
> New patch below. Tested on arm-eabi sim with a few multilibs.
OK.
Ramana
On 09/07/11 10:28, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 2 September 2011 12:42, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 09/02/11 12:35, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>> On 1 September 2011 12:50, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Shrink-wrapping tests on ARM had one additional failure, which I could
track down to a s
On 2 September 2011 12:42, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 09/02/11 12:35, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> On 1 September 2011 12:50, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>> Shrink-wrapping tests on ARM had one additional failure, which I could
>>> track down to a stmfd instruction being emitted where an stmhifd was
>
On 09/02/11 12:35, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 1 September 2011 12:50, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> Shrink-wrapping tests on ARM had one additional failure, which I could
>> track down to a stmfd instruction being emitted where an stmhifd was
>> intended. The following patch fixes the testcase; fu
On 1 September 2011 12:50, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Shrink-wrapping tests on ARM had one additional failure, which I could
> track down to a stmfd instruction being emitted where an stmhifd was
> intended. The following patch fixes the testcase; full tests running
> now. Ok?
IIUC this should have b
