On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> I don't think all-all is a useful default. "optimized" may be though.
>
> I relied on old documentation installed on one of my system.
> Apparently the default changed to optimized-
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> I don't think all-all is a useful default. "optimized" may be though.
I relied on old documentation installed on one of my system.
Apparently the default changed to optimized-optall. So, no change to
the documentation needed if the general
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>> The manual says about -fop-info:
>>
>>If OPTIONS is omitted, it defaults to 'all-all', which means
>> dump all available optimization info from all the passes.
>>
Anyone?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> The manual says about -fop-info:
>
>If OPTIONS is omitted, it defaults to 'all-all', which means
> dump all available optimization info from all the passes.
>
> The current implementation (at at least recent gcc 6.1) don't f
