On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58:29AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> + /* Even if the stack pointer isn't the CFA register, we need to correctly
>> + describe the adjustments made to it, in particular differentiate the
>> + frame-related
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58:29AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> + /* Even if the stack pointer isn't the CFA register, we need to correctly
> + describe the adjustments made to it, in particular differentiate the
> + frame-related ones from the frame-unrelated ones. */
> + if (size > 0)
>
Hello!
> this is a regression present for x86-64 on mainline and 4.6 branch with the
> options -Os -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 -fstack-check
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
> This improbable combination of options is necessary because you need to have
> stack checking + stack realignment + !ACCUMULAT
