Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-05-04 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Committed with the suggested changes (see attachment for reference). Thanks. Best regards, Thomas On 23/03/17 06:47, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: Hi Thomas, On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Is this ok for wwwdocs once [1] is committed in GCC 8 cycle? + GCC on Microsoft Windows c

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-05-04 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Great, thanks. I'll go and commit the corresponding wwwdocs change. Best regards, Thomas On 04/05/17 12:03, JonY wrote: On 03/23/2017 10:47 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Ack. Please find updated patch as per suggestions. Best regards, Thomas I've applied the changes to GCC 8 trunk as r247

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-05-04 Thread JonY
On 03/23/2017 10:47 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > Ack. Please find updated patch as per suggestions. > > Best regards, > > Thomas > I've applied the changes to GCC 8 trunk as r247588. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-23 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Ack. Please find updated patch as per suggestions. Best regards, Thomas On 23/03/17 06:47, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: Hi Thomas, On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Is this ok for wwwdocs once [1] is committed in GCC 8 cycle? + GCC on Microsoft Windows can now be configured via +

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-22 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Hi Thomas, On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Is this ok for wwwdocs once [1] is committed in GCC 8 cycle? + GCC on Microsoft Windows can now be configured via + --enable-mingw-wildcard or + --disable-mingw-wildcard to force a specific behavior for + GCC itself

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-22 Thread JonY
On 03/22/2017 05:39 PM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > Hi JonY, > > Sorry for the delay. Please find updated patch as per Gerald and you > suggestion. > > Is this ok for wwwdocs once [1] is committed in GCC 8 cycle? > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01153.html > > Best regards,

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-22 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Hi JonY, Sorry for the delay. Please find updated patch as per Gerald and you suggestion. Is this ok for wwwdocs once [1] is committed in GCC 8 cycle? [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01153.html Best regards, Thomas On 12/03/17 23:51, JonY wrote: On 03/12/2017 02:07 PM, Ger

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-12 Thread JonY
On 03/12/2017 02:07 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: >> JonY: what about the attached patch to document the change of behavior >> of GCC on Windows depending on the configure option used? > > +MinGW issues > + > +GCC on Microsoft Windows can now be configure

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-12 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: JonY: what about the attached patch to document the change of behavior of GCC on Windows depending on the configure option used? +MinGW issues + +GCC on Microsoft Windows can now be configured via +--enable-mingw-wildcard or --disable-mingw-wildcard

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-09 Thread JonY
On 03/09/2017 11:22 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > I forgot to mention "ok for stage1?", my bad. JonY said he was queuing > the corresponding changes in GCC for stage1 so I was just trying to have > a complete story. I do not expect to commit this before the actual code > change is c

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-09 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Hi Jakub, I forgot to mention "ok for stage1?", my bad. JonY said he was queuing the corresponding changes in GCC for stage1 so I was just trying to have a complete story. I do not expect to commit this before the actual code change is committed. Best regards, Thomas On 09/03/17 10:58, Jaku

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:51:27AM +, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > Thanks Gerald, > > JonY: what about the attached patch to document the change of behavior of > GCC on Windows depending on the configure option used? GCC 7 has not branched yet, so the change can't be committed anywhere. It seem

Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html

2017-03-09 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Thanks Gerald, JonY: what about the attached patch to document the change of behavior of GCC on Windows depending on the configure option used? Best regards, Thomas On 04/03/17 14:25, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: This should be mentioned in the "portin