On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 15:19 +0100, Oleg Endo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 19:13 -1000, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > Hi Oleg,
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Oleg Endo wrote:
> > >> +Added support for the built-in functions
> > >> +__builtin_thread_pointer and
> > >> +__builtin_set
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 19:13 -1000, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Oleg Endo wrote:
> >> +Added support for the built-in functions
> >> +__builtin_thread_pointer and
> >> +__builtin_set_thread_pointer. This assumes that
> >> +GBR is used to hold the
Hi Oleg,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Oleg Endo wrote:
>> +Added support for the built-in functions
>> +__builtin_thread_pointer and
>> +__builtin_set_thread_pointer. This assumes that
>> +GBR is used to hold the thread pointer of the current
>> thread,
>> +which has been the case si
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 00:45 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Oleg Endo wrote:
> > This documents the new thread pointer built-ins in the SH www changes
> > for 4.8.
>
> Thanks, Oleg.
>
> I've got one change and one question:
>
> +Added support for the built-in functions
> +
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Oleg Endo wrote:
> This documents the new thread pointer built-ins in the SH www changes
> for 4.8.
Thanks, Oleg.
I've got one change and one question:
+Added support for the built-in functions
+__builtin_thread_pointer and
+__builtin_set_thread_pointer. This ass
Oleg Endo wrote:
> This documents the new thread pointer built-ins in the SH www changes
> for 4.8.
> OK?
Looks OK to me.
Regards,
kaz
