On Fri, 15 Apr 2022, Fernando Oleo Blanco wrote:
> thank you for your comments. As you have picked up, HTML is not my
> strongest language.
>
> I did not know that "<" and ">" had to scaped in HTML, I will try to
> remember that.
No worries, Fernando. "<" and ">" require special handling in HTML
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I am not familiar with that Emacs mode, but < and > are special characters
> in HTML and have to be written as < (less than) and > (greater than)
> respectively.
Here is a second batch which I had missed originally.
Also pushed...
Gerald
commit a
Am Wed, 13 Apr 2022 23:04:17 -0600 (MDT)
schrieb "Gerald Pfeifer" :
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > This is the first batch of fixes. Pushed.
>
> Hmm, there is one issue that confused me a bit. What did you want to
> relay by the following?
>
>+Pattern matching
>+
On 05/04/22 06:05 +, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
Thank you for the feedback. Should I remove it and resuply the patch or
can you/GCC maintainers do the modification before merging?
Can you please resubmit it?
I'll let others comment on the need to sign a contributor agreement, my
understanding i
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> This is the first batch of fixes. Pushed.
Hmm, there is one issue that confused me a bit. What did you want to
relay by the following?
+Pattern matching
+
+ The case statement has been extended to cover
Currently that is a withi
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022, Fernando Oleo Blanco via Gcc-patches wrote:
> this is my first patch to GCC, if there is anything off, please, say
> so. I have used the default HTML formatting that comes with Emacs.
I am not familiar with that Emacs mode, but < and > are special characters
in HTML and have t
> Thank you all for your feedback and guidance. I have taken Eric's
> feedback and deleted the relevant entry.
>
> Since I do not have write access, I cannot add myself to the
> MAINTAINERS file. Therefore, I want to explicitly state that I am
> submitting these patches under the DCO. I have read
Am Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:30:32 +0200
schrieb "Richard Biener" :
> If you have git write access you should add yourself in the DCO
> section in the MAINTAINERS file. Otherwise it has been said it's
> enough to explicitly state in mail that you are contributing this
> change under the Developer's Cert
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:06 AM Arnaud Charlet via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the feedback. Should I remove it and resuply the patch or
> > can you/GCC maintainers do the modification before merging?
>
> Can you please resubmit it?
>
> I'll let others comment on the need to sign a contr
> Thank you for the feedback. Should I remove it and resuply the patch or
> can you/GCC maintainers do the modification before merging?
Can you please resubmit it?
I'll let others comment on the need to sign a contributor agreement, my
understanding is that this is unavoidable, whether you're con
Am Mon, 04 Apr 2022 23:51:24 +0200
schrieb "Eric Botcazou" :
> Thanks for your contribution. Small nit:
>
> + Support for 128bit integers has beed added.
>
> The support was already present in GCC 11, the criterion being the
> use of the 'Max_Integer_Size attribute in system.ads.
>
> --
> Eric B
> this is my first patch to GCC, if there is anything off, please, say
> so. I have used the default HTML formatting that comes with Emacs. I
> have created the patch using the `git format-patch` utility.
Thanks for your contribution. Small nit:
+ Support for 128bit integers has beed added.
Th
12 matches
Mail list logo
