Re: [wide-int] Update main comment

2013-11-04 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Kenneth Zadeck writes: > > On 10/30/2013 07:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >> Kenneth Zadeck writes: > >>> On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the > curren

Re: [wide-int] Update main comment

2013-10-31 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
On 10/30/2013 02:34 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: Kenneth Zadeck writes: On 10/30/2013 07:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: Kenneth Zadeck writes: On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the current implementation. - bit

Re: [wide-int] Update main comment

2013-10-30 Thread Richard Sandiford
Kenneth Zadeck writes: > On 10/30/2013 07:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Kenneth Zadeck writes: >>> On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the current implementation. - bitsizetype is TImode on x86_6

Re: [wide-int] Update main comment

2013-10-30 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
On 10/30/2013 07:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: Kenneth Zadeck writes: On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the current implementation. - bitsizetype is TImode on x86_64 and others, so I don't think it's necessar

Re: [wide-int] Update main comment

2013-10-30 Thread Richard Sandiford
Kenneth Zadeck writes: > On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the current >> implementation. >> >> - bitsizetype is TImode on x86_64 and others, so I don't think it's >>necessarily true that all offset_ints are sign

Re: [wide-int] Update main comment

2013-10-29 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the current implementation. - bitsizetype is TImode on x86_64 and others, so I don't think it's necessarily true that all offset_ints are signed. (widest_int are though.) i am