On 11/05/2015 09:01 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-10-27 23:52 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
Sigh. I searched for the enum type, not for CODE_FOR_nothing ;( My bad.
If it's easy to get rid of, yes. I believe we've got 3 uses of
CODE_FOR_nothing. AFAICT in none of those cases do we care about the cod
2015-10-27 23:52 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
>
> Sigh. I searched for the enum type, not for CODE_FOR_nothing ;( My bad.
>
> If it's easy to get rid of, yes. I believe we've got 3 uses of
> CODE_FOR_nothing. AFAICT in none of those cases do we care about the code
> other than does it correspond to COD
On 10/22/2015 10:12 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-10-22 18:52 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
On 10/22/2015 04:35 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-10-21 20:25 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
On 10/08/2015 08:52 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This series introduces autogeneration of vector comparison and its
suppor
2015-10-22 18:52 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/22/2015 04:35 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> 2015-10-21 20:25 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2015 08:52 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This series introduces autogeneration of vector comparison and its
support
on
On 10/22/2015 04:35 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-10-21 20:25 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
On 10/08/2015 08:52 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This series introduces autogeneration of vector comparison and its support
on i386 target. It lets comparison statements to be vectorized into vector
comparison
2015-10-21 20:25 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/08/2015 08:52 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series introduces autogeneration of vector comparison and its support
>> on i386 target. It lets comparison statements to be vectorized into vector
>> comparison instead of VEC_COND_EXPR. Thi
On 10/08/2015 08:52 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This series introduces autogeneration of vector comparison and its support on
i386 target. It lets comparison statements to be vectorized into vector
comparison instead of VEC_COND_EXPR. This allows to avoid some restrictions
implied by boole
