Re: [v3] is_modulo

2012-04-29 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> the attached follows the precisions on the definition of is_modulo in DR >>> 612. I believe this is what the values al

Re: [v3] is_modulo

2012-04-28 Thread Marc Glisse
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: Hello, the attached follows the precisions on the definition of is_modulo in DR 612. I believe this is what the values always should have been, so I didn't make the change conditional to C++11.

Re: [v3] is_modulo

2012-04-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: > Hello, > > the attached follows the precisions on the definition of is_modulo in DR > 612. I believe this is what the values always should have been, so I didn't > make the change conditional to C++11. Thanks for the patch. I think 'char' sho