On 8/8/19 12:30 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> rand is in ISO C, whereas random is only in POSIX, so it makes sense
> to use the more portable function everywhere instead of falling back
> from one to the other on systems that miss the less portable one.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, native and cr
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 03:30:55AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> rand is in ISO C, whereas random is only in POSIX, so it makes sense
> to use the more portable function everywhere instead of falling back
> from one to the other on systems that miss the less portable one.
>
> Tested on x86_64-li
