Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

Christophe Lyon writes: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:48, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> >> Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches writes: >> > Hi, >> > >> > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that >> > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we >> > g

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 11:48, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches writes: > > Hi, > > > > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that > > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we > > generate > > nonsecure2: > >

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches writes: > Hi, > > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we > generate > nonsecure2: > b nonsecure0 > > which is OK, but does not match the currently expe

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 at 12:31, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > > On 06/04/2020 16:12, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that > > the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we > > generate > > no

Re: [testsuite][arm] Fix cmse-15.c expected output

On 06/04/2020 16:12, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote: Hi, While checking Martin's fix for PR ipa/94445, he made me realize that the cmse-15.c testcase still fails at -Os because ICF means that we generate nonsecure2: b nonsecure0 which is OK, but does not match the currentl