On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>> >> > Attached is the updated patch. Yes, if we add a VRP pass before
>> >> > profile pass, this patch would be unnecessary. Should
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> >> > Attached is the updated patch. Yes, if we add a VRP pass before
> >> > profile pass, this patch would be unnecessary. Should we add a VRP
> >> > pass?
> >>
> >> No, we don't want VR
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>> > Attached is the updated patch. Yes, if we add a VRP pass before
>> > profile pass, this patch would be unnecessary. Should we add a VRP
>> > pass?
>>
>> No, we don't want VRP in early opt
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> > Attached is the updated patch. Yes, if we add a VRP pass before
> > profile pass, this patch would be unnecessary. Should we add a VRP
> > pass?
>
> No, we don't want VRP in early optimizations.
I am not quite sure about that. VRP
1) make
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> Attached is the updated patch. Yes, if we add a VRP pass before
> profile pass, this patch would be unnecessary. Should we add a VRP
> pass?
No, we don't want VRP in early optimizations.
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Dehao
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:
Attached is the updated patch. Yes, if we add a VRP pass before
profile pass, this patch would be unnecessary. Should we add a VRP
pass?
Thanks,
Dehao
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> ping^2
>>
>> Honza, do you think this patch can make into 4.8 stage 1?
>
> + if (check
> ping^2
>
> Honza, do you think this patch can make into 4.8 stage 1?
+ if (check_value_one ^ integer_onep (val))
Probably better as !=
(especially because GNU coding standard allows predicates to return more than
just boolean)
+{
+ edge e1;
+ edge_iterator ei;
+ tree
ping^2
Honza, do you think this patch can make into 4.8 stage 1?
Thanks,
Dehao
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01975.html
>
> Thanks,
> Dehao
