On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/3/21 Richard Guenther :
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> 2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM
2012/3/21 Richard Guenther :
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Kai Tietz
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> 2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the second part of the patch for this proble
2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,
this is the second part of the patch for this problem. It adds some
basic simplifications for ==/!=
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is the second part of the patch for this problem. It adds some
>>> basic simplifications for ==/!=
>>> comparisons for eliminating redudant o
2012/3/15 Richard Guenther :
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is the second part of the patch for this problem. It adds some
>> basic simplifications for ==/!=
>> comparisons for eliminating redudant operands.
>>
>> It adds the following patterns:
>> -X ==/!=
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the second part of the patch for this problem. It adds some
> basic simplifications for ==/!=
> comparisons for eliminating redudant operands.
>
> It adds the following patterns:
> -X ==/!= Z - X -> Z ==/!= 0.
> ~X ==/!= Z ^ X