Re: [patch 0/10] debug-early merge

2015-05-11 Thread Aldy Hernandez
Perfect. Thanks for doing this. Aldy On May 11, 2015 4:23 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > Hi Aldy, > > On 08/05/15 01:30, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > Hi folks. > > > > I have divided the patches into 10 pieces.  The patches are > > interdependent and cannot be applied independently.  I am merel

Re: [patch 0/10] debug-early merge

2015-05-11 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi Aldy, On 08/05/15 01:30, Aldy Hernandez wrote: Hi folks. I have divided the patches into 10 pieces. The patches are interdependent and cannot be applied independently. I am merely dividing them up to aid the relevant reviewers. As I've mentioned elsewhere, the patchset as posted has been

Re: [PATCH] Non-working jit patch for debug-early (was Re: [patch 0/10] debug-early merge)

2015-05-08 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 05/08/2015 10:38 AM, David Malcolm wrote: I tested your branch (at 09263eae7c260c305fa19ffa186afd1d89654fb8) with the jit configuration from the docs: ../src/configure \ --enable-host-shared \ --enable-languages=jit,c++ \ --disable-bootstrap \ --enable-checking=release \ --

Re: [patch 0/10] debug-early merge

2015-05-08 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 05/08/2015 07:41 AM, David Malcolm wrote: On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 17:30 -0700, Aldy Hernandez wrote: Hi folks. I have divided the patches into 10 pieces. The patches are interdependent and cannot be applied independently. I am merely dividing them up to aid the relevant reviewers. As I've m

Re: [patch 0/10] debug-early merge

2015-05-08 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 17:30 -0700, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Hi folks. > > I have divided the patches into 10 pieces. The patches are > interdependent and cannot be applied independently. I am merely > dividing them up to aid the relevant reviewers. > > As I've mentioned elsewhere, the patchset

Re: [patch 0/10] debug-early merge

2015-05-08 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Hi folks. > > I have divided the patches into 10 pieces. The patches are interdependent > and cannot be applied independently. I am merely dividing them up to aid > the relevant reviewers. > > As I've mentioned elsewhere, the patchset as po