Re: [patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-16 Thread Ilya Verbin
On 15 Jan 09:40, Richard Biener wrote: > Note that we still have the issue that we want to exercise both > WHOPR and non-WHOPR in the testsuite but all testcases are so > small that we'd automagically would use non-WHOPR mode (if > such automatism was implemented...). Several tests in libgomp test

Re: [patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > On 01/14/2015 01:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> Whenever I get to the LTO part of this project, I promise to start >>> documenting things better. This whole thing is a mystery. >> >> >> Well - mostly to me as well ;) I'll let Honza ans

Re: [patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-14 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 01/14/2015 01:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Whenever I get to the LTO part of this project, I promise to start documenting things better. This whole thing is a mystery. Well - mostly to me as well ;) I'll let Honza answer this... Ha, you're being too modest! I get the feeling that no on

Re: [patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Hi Richard. > > I'm chasing my tail here looking at an LTO + debug problem, and for the life > of me I can't figure out how all this partition business affects a symbol's > `analyzed' bit. Anyways... the documentation for all these function