> Hmm, what do you have in mind for such a situation?
>
> If extract_asm_operands returns NULL then asm_noperands will return -1.
>
> If extract_asm_operands returns non-NULL then asm_noperands deep-dives
> the PATTERN of the insn (just like extract_asm_operands) and returns
> >= 0 unless the ins
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> This idiom: "if (GET_CODE (body) == ASM_INPUT || asm_noperands (body)
>>
>> >= 0)" appears in multiple places. There's even one place where the
>>
>> idiom above is used in reverse (making the GET_CODE... check
>> redundant). A few more place
> This idiom: "if (GET_CODE (body) == ASM_INPUT || asm_noperands (body)
>
> >= 0)" appears in multiple places. There's even one place where the
>
> idiom above is used in reverse (making the GET_CODE... check
> redundant). A few more places to the equivalent by checking
> extract_asm_operands !=
