On 10/17/2013 11:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
*** struct omp_for_data
*** 135,141
static splay_tree all_contexts;
static int taskreg_nesting_level;
static int target_nesting_level;
! struct omp_region *root_omp_region;
static bitmap task_shared_vars;
static void
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:52:21AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 11:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>*** struct omp_for_data
> >>*** 135,141
> >> static splay_tree all_contexts;
> >> static int taskreg_nesting_level;
> >> static int target_nesting_level;
> >>! s
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:46:43PM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Bootstraps on 86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and no new regressions. OK?
>
> Andrew
>
> * tree-flow.h (struct omp_region): Move to omp-low.c
Missing dot at the end of line.
> Remove omp_ prototypes and variables.
> *
On 10/11/2013 04:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Missed a bit in tree-flow.h.. I mistakenly assumed omp_region belonged
there :-P
Anyway by moving struct omp_region into omp_low.h, along with the prototypes
from tree-flow.h, gimple.h and tre
On 10/11/2013 04:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:12:17AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
I can spot the end of a comment containing "OpenMP Region Tree"
that you didn't move - probably an oversight.
Otherwise ok.
Please wait for the gomp4 merge (which I'm going to commit to
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:12:17AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> I can spot the end of a comment containing "OpenMP Region Tree"
> that you didn't move - probably an oversight.
>
> Otherwise ok.
Please wait for the gomp4 merge (which I'm going to commit today).
Jakub
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Missed a bit in tree-flow.h.. I mistakenly assumed omp_region belonged
> there :-P
>
> Anyway by moving struct omp_region into omp_low.h, along with the prototypes
> from tree-flow.h, gimple.h and tree.h. Everything works great with just a
