Il 18/03/2013 01:01, Steven Bosscher ha scritto:
>> > someone else DF aware anyway. If it is 4.9 material perhaps
>> > it is simpler to place it after the patches that kill the basic
>> > block argument.
> Here is the updated patch. Bootstrapped&tested on
> powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trun
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> someone else DF aware anyway. If it is 4.9 material perhaps
>> it is simpler to place it after the patches that kill the basic
>> block argument.
>
> Here is the updated patch. Bootst
> > so it needs someone DF aware to review
> > and that makes it stage1 material as well I think.
>
> Also good. I think the patch is quite safe but it's obviously not a
> bug fix (except perhaps for making the dumps less confusing). Let's
> consider this queued for GCC 4.9.
> FWIW, I like to thi
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> +/* Delete all of the refs information from the insn with UID.
> + Internal helper for df_insn_info_delete, df_insn_rescan, and other
>
> df_insn_delete I suppose
Right.
> + df
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch splits a new function df_insn_info_delete from
> df_insn_delete. The original motivation was to get rid of the silly
> "deleting insn with uid = ..." messages when re-scanning an insn,
> because the mentioned i
